DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 ยง. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR6904- 14
3 Mar 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
> March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
= . er wi
considered by the Board consisted of your application,
er
e
considered the advisory opinion furnished by
2015, a copy of which was provided to you on
being provided to you now
1 3
peen denied. The names and votes of the u he pane
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not y
this case. In this regard, it 1s important to keep in mine that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official recoras
when appli
burden is on
Plate eis
1 error
5
)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6088 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12003 14
The Board also considered a COPY of your fitness report for 15 January to 2 October 2010, whose removal was directed by the HOMC Performance Evaluation Review Board, and the HOMC e-mail dated 21 November 2014 (the basis for the PERB action), a COPY of which is also attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9209 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 30 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR9209-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6632 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJIN Docket No: 6632-14 12 Mav 2015 This is in reference to your application f record pursuant to the provisions of title Code, section 1552, or correction of your naval 10 of the United States a A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. The names and votes of the members of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2106 15
A three-member panel.of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5623 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereor, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3896 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR880 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11687 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1122 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. in this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3C reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires.